The Spoony Experiment

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull – A Rant

by Scarlett on May 25, 2008 · 129 comments

I just got back from watching Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and I was so stunned that I had to babble incoherently about it for about twenty minutes. It’s unscripted, unplanned, and borderline senseless raving, but damn it, you need to hear it!

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 129 comments… read them below or add one }

101
Alia September 1, 2009 at 10:48 pm

I still refuse to acknowledge this as an Indy film.

Hello! Last Crusade? You know as in last, done, over, finnished and finally NO MORE! You don’t name something the last and then make more.

102
Alex Kozak September 3, 2009 at 9:39 pm

I’m afraid you are correct Spoony. There is a 5th film coming. You know what’s worse? They kill off Harrison Ford and make Shia LeBUTTFUCK the Icon of the franchise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think that is what the whole 2012 business is about!!!!!

103
Heroesrock09 September 5, 2009 at 4:18 am

Actually I liked this movie. NOTHING wrong with it. :{

104
Apathetic One September 9, 2009 at 2:12 am

Phew…for a moment there I thought you might not mention the two worst scenes: The fridge and the monkeys…
This was a shit movie. Temple was SO much better….I’ll take Shortround over Shia ANYDAY!!

105
SplittinAdam September 16, 2009 at 11:51 am

Need to ask, oh Spoony One… were you drunk when you recorded this?

106
Demus September 16, 2009 at 12:15 pm

That really was a horrible movie – I can’t believe it even at this day. Aliens and Indy? Cheez… at the second watching time I thought, “hey, maybe I change my mind and I start to think maybe this movie is not THAT bad after all”. Bullfuck! The experience was even worse! I continuously seek those bad things from it and oh how much fucking hate it. And now they are making indy 5 – my god… whatta hell? Let’s hope everybody that ufoshit is past, Indy is not DEAD and Mutt Williams is not the main hero… and it’s more old schooler. Fucking animated anal ants…

107
Demus September 16, 2009 at 12:39 pm

My fucking god… I just checked George Lucas’ plans for Indy 5 from some interview… I was horribly RIGHT, but Indy is not dead! Lucas sees that Mutt is the main character in the fifth movie while Indy is sidecharacter like Sean Connery in Indy 3. It’s not anymore “Indiana Jones” movie – IT’S “MUTT JONES”. My god, fuck, shit, assrape!

108
Geezmo September 17, 2009 at 12:17 am

Ohhhh Spoony. My god, you are so right. There is nothing in my childhood that Lucas has NOT royally fucked up. It just makes me so sad. Oh why?!

109
Garry September 17, 2009 at 11:38 am

I thought it was good, an enjoyable watch that contained alot of what we enjoyed about previous Indy films. It wasn’t as good as the originals, with the exception of the Temple of Doom perhaps, but it was a good movie; the only part that made me half-cringe was the part with Indy Jr. swinging on vines in the jungle – that WAS a step too far.

Erm, and just a point: “LAST” in ‘The Last Crusade’ is not a reference to Indiana Jones as much as it is to the story of the movie. The Crusades were all about occupying Jerusalem and, supposedly, the search for the Holy Grail; since the movie’s plot was about searching for the Holy Grail it was a Crusade, and since the Holy Grail is lost at the end of the movie it’s therefore the LAST Crusade.

110
Arawn September 17, 2009 at 8:26 pm

kingdom of the crystal skull????, whats that?, as far as i know there are only 3 indiana jones movies.
you must be seeing things, the trilogy is just that a trilogy……

Any attempt to convince me otherwise will be answered via blunt object to the head REPEATEDLY

111
rbx5 September 18, 2009 at 11:40 am

After getting home from watching this movie, for no apparent reason, I passed out right in my driveway, hitting my head and getting a minor concussion, resulting in short term memory loss and my forgetting pretty much everything I saw.

Seriously, I’m not making this up; this movie sucks so bad God went out of his way to make me forget it. Probably ‘cuz Spielberg didn’t let him appear in this one like with Raiders and Last Crusade, which would explain Temple of Doom, now that I think about it…

112
Arvid September 22, 2009 at 5:31 am

Yes… yes… The movie sucks, but please! Finish youre meal before you edit the review.

113
Wyvern September 24, 2009 at 11:32 pm

I presume you meant John Hurt?
Still, you’re very right. Although the movie is watchable, it’s definintely not the Indy we all grew up with. I have to say, I feel kinda sorry for Shia LeBeouf. People keep casting him in roles where he’s going to get enormous hate from people.

114
Robert September 25, 2009 at 12:55 am

Ok not even joking when i say this. But I could write a significantly better Indiana Jones script in one day. Not a word of a lie, it would be easy. Im not even good at writing but i could make something better then this piece of dog crap that they call a movie. Someone needs to dress up in a Jar Jar Binks costume and beat George Lucas senseless, then tie him up and make him watch this disaster piece non stop until he manages to train his laughing gophers to tear his eyes out.

115
Eric Smith September 27, 2009 at 10:09 pm

Holy shit!!! I completely agree with you on every aspect you ranted on about this movie!! I was so abhorred by this bucket of butt waste that I started coming up with my own idea for a fourth Indy film. I’m seriously thinking of shipping the treatment to both Spielberg and Lucas and tell them, this is how it should’ve been done!!! I had three friends of mine, who are HUGE Indy fans, read it, and say that my version is a lot better than this abomination! (My version was titled “Indiana Jones and the Secret of the Sphinx” and involved a secret, hidden treasure long buried underneath the Great Sphinx. Marion would be dead and a young man accompanies Indy, who is as you might have guessed, his son. However, the revelation is done in a more subtle manner and bonding between the two is a strong point, much like that between Indy and his dad in LAST CRUSADE. Also, my version may have the KGB wanting to get their hands on the gold. I’ve written a draft with that in it, but am not sure about keeing it in. *All this is copyrighted thus far.*) I get baffled every time I read someone saying something positive about it. I did a double take when I picked up my copy of Leonard Maltin’s 2009 Movie Guide and saw that one of the most prestigious critics IN THE WORLD gave it 3 1/2 STARS!! WTF?!?!?!

I started getting bummed there for a second when you shut it off and it went to the “No Signal bars” or whatever the hell they’re called. I was like, ‘What about the “radiation fridge incident?”‘ Then you came back on and answered that question for me. That is, by far, one of the dumbest moments not only in Indiana Jones history, but in film history! One big reason this film has aliens in it is partly because the script was written by David Koepp, who wrote Spielberg’s version of WAR OF THE WORLDS! Something should seriously happen. Make a better sequel or remake it. Either way, keep Shia LeBeouf out of it!! His character was so damn annoying!!

Another point I should bring up…what’s with all the 1950s references? Elvis’ “Hound Dog” playing as a group of teenagers drag race a military soldier (another moronic scene); Shia’s entrance (taken from Marlon Brando’s THE WILD ONE); and others I can’t think of at the moment. The Cold War references are fine because those are real topics that were encountered in the ’50s, but all the other references felt heavy-handed and kinda thrust into the audiences’ faces. Did you see any of that in the three previous films? No.

This movie is rubbish.

116
LiK September 29, 2009 at 8:49 pm

Spoony is 100% right on. Indy 4 is fucking shit.

117
movie buff 344 October 5, 2009 at 2:06 pm

THEY RAPED HIM RIGHT IN THE ASS good rant though

118
Nova503 October 5, 2009 at 4:04 pm

What is everyone talkin’ bout? There are only 3 Indy films. No matter what anyone says, there are only 3 Indy films, and if George Lucas DID make a 4th film, he better not FUCK it up. Like aliens, wouldn’t it be hilarious if an INDY film had ALIENS? That’d be the worse movie ever.

119
Hubilub October 6, 2009 at 1:43 pm

@ Nova503

Yeah, good thing they won’t make a movie like that. And what if the also made prequels to the star wars movies. With Hayden Christensen as Anakin Skywalker. Man, I wouldn’t want to live in a fucked up world like that.

120
hadokenboom25 October 14, 2009 at 6:18 am

@Nova503 and Hubilub
Yeah, I’m so glad that we live in a world where none of that crap exists and stuff. Now excuse me, I have to go see Jimi Hendrix right after I finish playing Mother 4

121
Boppa October 14, 2009 at 2:39 pm

I agree with the review. And LOL at 9:25 :D

122
Stupid Idiot October 17, 2009 at 1:57 pm

I can’t wait to see Lego Indy 2 do some awesome self-parodoy of this movie.
Great review Spoony! Its great how you mix legitimate complaints with being absolutely hilarious.

123
BumBo October 26, 2009 at 3:23 pm

Take away the aliens, make it about a magnetic artifact of the natives, the ones they fight, origin, make the relations in the film more subtle add a better musical score, make the climax more original and the movie COULD have been okay. But no. There are aliens, the skull has nothing to do with the climax, its just a key to open a door. The relations are so obvious its an insult to my intelligence and the climax has been done to the syllable, and done better.

Its fine to like this movie I guess. But I really didn’t.

124
auPHE October 27, 2009 at 7:08 am

I… I think I love you, Spoony. I have been telling my friends the same things about Disturbia and Rear Window (seriously? I still can’t believe they even /tried/ to create someone scarier than Lars Thorwald) for YEARS now, and they still insist that the piece of shit “I’m original!” remake is better.

Alas (or not), I haven’t been to see the new Indiana Jones movie. ‘Cause you see, I have this little thing about keeping my childhood intact…

125
Steevis October 30, 2009 at 6:47 am

Ive seen worse, but I am very pissed that i dropped like 10 bucks to see it. And I went with a group of like 9 people no less. I feel responsible for movies like this because I wanted to remember how young I was when the older ones came out. I fell for the gimmick also, and I am displeased…sigh

126
Paul S. Pinto November 3, 2009 at 5:27 pm

Can I borrow your nostalgia blinders? Mine got scratched. It was an Indiana Jones adventure full of larger than life, crazy shit. Just like the others and just liked I’d hoped for for years, and especially like Temple Of Doom, which you defend. By the way, many of your issues can be fixed by simply watching again and paying attention. It was an adventure story modeled after the 1950’s B movie cinema, and this film buff wouldn’t have had it any other way.

127
SidewaysThinker November 6, 2009 at 5:23 pm

Okay I will admit that this movie was not exactly the best Indy film ever, but it was still a good movie. I really don’t understand why people hate this thing so much

128
Radar November 6, 2009 at 6:32 pm

Spoony, glad you hate that kid too! “You made a worse movie then Michael Bay!” lol Couldn’t agree more man!

129
Allison November 7, 2009 at 4:41 pm

I don’t know anyone with good things to say about this movie. And if you don’t blame George Lucas, blame Shia LaBeof, who’s mastered the ability of being the same person in every movie.

Leave a Comment